Contact Me

                          My Rant on Religion

I'm the author of the book 'The Theory of Infinity - The End of God. The sub-title 'the End of God' being the natural result reality of my 'Theory of Infinity', an in-depth functional analysis of our universe as never before formulated. And, over time, I believe that this (my) theory will be proven (accepted as) 'correct' and embraced as the reality 'of it all' - by this I mean that for the 1st time in history our universe's 'true nature' and 'full life cycle' will be understood by people worldwide, except for the religious flocks that will continue to bury their heads in the sand enabling them to cling to their denial of truth. My theory overthrows the present day understanding of Einstein's Space-time Gravity, and, the irresponsibly presented Big Bang Theory of scientific failing. Furthermore, as the sub-title implies, it's a book that does not suffer the 'get along' to 'go along' integrity downgrade of political correctness while it delivers the core realities of our universe - it's a 'no bullshit' book, an avenue to a new awareness and enlightenment.
      Political correctness (a societal trend of perverted ethics) is the present day Modus Operandi (MO) of the majority of people in the US, those that fail in their responsibility to the stability of our country. These are those people that bend over backwards to kiss the asses of 'arrogant factions' within our nation in a misguided effort to try to not upset or hurt their feelings. American's 'all too often' bypass opportunities to employ 'justified intolerance' to repel arrogant factions wanting the rest of us to accommodate their unjustified self-serving positions or goals - conformances that are (literally always) 'free rides' paid for by others (in imposition, oppression, and cost) that are (also always) out of alignment with the laws of the land. These people expect unmerited (certainly unearned) and absolutely unlawful special treatment. These factions of 'untenable expectations' seeking to disable the protections (thus the rights) that our Constitution provides, should be 'shut down' in their tracks regardless of their 'battle cry' or number in group - remember that a majority group can be just as 'out of line' as a minority group when wanting to circumvent the basic protections of 'all' citizens under our Constitution. In these basic rights and freedoms, not even a majority group desiring to delete a protection, freedom, or right, can prevail and force its' disappearance (that is, 'if' our government actually upholds the Constitution) - thus they (given arrogant factions) cannot 'rob' the rest of us of said protection, freedom, or right simply because of their majority arrogance or manifest group stupidity.
          In spite of the clearly stated protections of our Constitution, there are those factions (forces) that are in the majority (or are assumed to be if you believe in the truthfulness thus the accuracy of polls) that perpetually try to make the rest of us kiss 'their' asses in conformance to 'their' agendas ('their' rules and reg's reflecting 'their' beliefs that violate the constitutional rights of the remaining citizens). Essentially they seek to 'de facto negate' thus dissolve our freedoms, protections, and rights to refuse to comply (thus make us suffer their restrictions, impositions, and costs). I'm talking suffering the 'endgame' of doctrines of manifest imposition and oppression that our Constitution is supposed to protect us from, even when we're in the smallest of minorities. With respect to 'protection' from these malignant forces of arrogance, I'm referring to the boilerplate premise of our foundation - the Separation of Church and State. This 'Separation', which more than anything else is a protection 'from Religion', is unquestionably a major 'cornerstone' of our Constitution. God is not supposed to be recognized in government affairs - 'no god', of any group's or faction's 'imagination', no matter how many bells and whistles are boasted.
          It's been a 'time after time' proven reality that Political Correctness is the 'cancer of conduct' of the weak minded (thus weak willed) that 'through inaction' works against our freedoms and rights. At minimum P.C. is the failure mode of the laziest Americans, in that, they (of gutless stock) try to make 'no waves' thus fail in their duty to resist the 'unwelcome encroachment' of those working to impose their 'will' upon us. Political Correctness thus being a 'key factor' working to 'blur the lines' of clarity, in that, basic proper protections are disabled (in de facto fashion) through the 'over accommodating conduct' of people 'too stupid' to realize that their P.C. default mode of 'inaction' amounts to nothing less than kissing the asses of those that 'to the contrary' should have their asses kicked (and kicked hard, and, kicked hard again). It is infuriating that those of delusional religious belief try to impose their doctrine/dogma onto others knowing full well that both common sense and common coutesy (not to mention the Constitution) dissallows such acts of oppression.
          My recalibrated USA would delete 'all' (crept-in time consecrated violations of) religious influence from 'all' government functions and laws, and, from 'any and all' decision processes relative to tax dollar allocation, and, from 'all' buildings and 'all' forms of currency (legal tender). The only reference to religion that would ever be mentioned in governmental business (laws, bills, documentation of every kind) would be verbiage 'specific' to protecting a person's 'right' to worship (fantasize), or NOT worship (fantasize), as they see fit - period. The freedom to worship is a protected 'right' of every person, but more importantly worship is certainly 'Not' a requirement of any person. Just as people have the 'right' to practice religion, 'all remaining other people' have the 'right' to be protected from religious encroachment or activity in every form.
          There is a very big difference between A) Our government being charged with the responsibility of protecting each person's right to worship (or NOT worship) as they see fit, as per our Constitution - and - B) Our government inappropriately actually taking part in promoting worship as 'noble' (when it is only 'noble' to those of 'religious orientation') while those of us of a 'reality orientation' find religion to be ridiculous and self-debasing at best, and, imposing and oppressive at worst - and therefore want 'Not' to be touched in any way by its' stench. To employ any religious 'act or feature' in government business 'is' to take sides (for 'some' and against 'others') and thus 'violate' the Constitution by forcing religion's costs, impositions, oppressions, and rituals onto those detesting them. Continuing the negatives of B) Our failed government supporting religion's agendas of influence and encouraging religion's perpetuation (when 'indifference' to the success or failure of 'all things religious' is required), and our failed government aiding with back-door tax dollar funding in facilitating their goals (when religion 'is' per our Constitution supposed to be a private enterprise disconnected from government function). An even worse aspect of the above item B) Our failed government's complicity in continuously allowing (voting-in) embedded religious input, conformances, content, and/or overtones thus corrupting our State and Federal laws and Agency Guidelines - when, again, government 'is' by Constitutional law supposed to be free of Church considerations.
          The United States government, as per our Constitution, is supposed to be 'Secular' - indifferent to religion such that both religious people and non-religious people alike have 'Absolute Equal Standing' whereas religion is a 'Private Enterprise' (a private choice) independent of government involvement. This means that not a single tax 'penny' should be spent on a religious enterprise or function. It also means that there should be no religious influence 'ever in play' when tax dollars are allocated to appropriately fund Secular Public Needs (the only needs that should be recognized). And this further means that 'Praying' at any government function should NEVER take place, such as prayers being conducted at the onset of sessions of our two (2) branches of Congress. Two basic examples of manifest religious pollution within our government are in the current decisions to 'Not fund' stem cell research, and, in past (and threatening present) decisions on abortion (legality or funding) - decisions that 'absolutely' should NOT be based on any religion's (cult's) delusional brand of godly morality as gleaned from (or assumed or extrapolated or interpolated from) their fictitious god's 'word' (or its' cast of fantasized characters such as the devil, other demons of lower rank, angels and archangels of varying ranks and purpose, and, other like absurdities of mental fabrication). And lastly decisions on governmental business should absolutely NOT be based on any given religion's false sanctity (the delusional holiness) of human life (i.e. fictitious human souls, eternal life after death, permanent retirement communities they call heaven and hell, blah, blah, blah). Give me a break.
          There is only life and 'absolute death' for 'ALL' life forms. Religion's embodiment, its' 'holiness delusion', diminishes the true value of human life 'a hundred fold' by shunning the reality of inescapable 'absolute death' - the core issue of reality that the religious 'hide from' as cloaked in their religious mindset of blind-faith belief (emotional desperation). How sad to be so afraid, thus pursue a path that is so out of touch with reality's truth - that life is a 'one time thing' for each and every discrete member of each and every life form, each of which in its' own time (by circumstances that overcome each) will become extinct. Humans being no exception, though per our intellect and technological ability (in spite of religion's historical effort to squelch both) we have a fighting chance against near-term extinction. Humans that think otherwise of these realities are truly deluded.
          Though our government is charged with protecting our rights as individuals to 'hold with' religious beliefs as long as not harmful to others (demonstrating the absolute 'personal' freedom of every citizen), government 'itself' is NOT supposed to take part in religious practice - for the sake of not violating the 'rights' of the 'remaining sane' whom face reality and want no part of religion's costs in 'all' its' forms. These 'cost forms' being in 'unlawful' tax dollars expended to religious ends, in 'unlawful' embedded conformances to religious beliefs in our laws, in 'unlawful' embedded restrictions as per religious beliefs in our laws, or in 100% 'illegal' bullshit laws that pander to specific religious 'only' demands and thus oppress everyone else (i.e. of primary importance are laws that 'restrict' scientific exploration, and, of secondary importance are laws of inconvenience that both 'restrict and oppress' such as laws that keep people from purchasing legal products on Sunday or within 'time windows' on Sunday). And, being no minor issue, it is unacceptable that non-religious people are often forced to sit through (witness) imposed religious rituals or practices in both public settings and/or most importantly in/at government institutions, installations, forums of function, or processes etc., etc. And finally, other than museums of history, 'No' tax dollar funded installation should be garbed-up with religious crap of any kind (i.e. decoration, paintings, statues, monuments, or architectural features or enhancements).
          Now, with respect to child abuse, there should be strict limits put on the degree 'to which' parents can indoctrinate their children to religion - just as there is a limit 'to which' parents can subject children to physical abuse, so also is their a common sense limit 'to which' religious indoctrination becomes mental abuse. Are children 'Property' or are they 'Individuals with Rights'? Rights potent enough to void (disallow) a given religious tenet, tradition, or practice - remember there are myriad of absurd religious acts and/or practices that are illegal. Just because 'something' falls under some nut's religious umbrella doesn't mean it's sane or legal. Aren't the parents that produce children responsible and accountable to protect them from abuse of 'Every Kind'? Of course they are - parents are charged with nurturing and protecting their children, but society is charged with protecting children from 'Over the Top' parents themselves. We must remember that 'adults' have the capability and leverage to tell another adult to 'get out of their face' when being imposed upon or when being put under the thumb of oppression, whereas children are constrained by both emotional and practical dependency upon their parent/s (whom may be 'less than' well balanced in both fairness and conduct) whereas children are helpless to extract their rights within their real world environment. Some children are lucky in the draw, lucky enough to be conceived by well-balanced individuals, other children are not so lucky.
          It is of importance that we are cognizant of the reality that religion 'when imposed in a reasonable fashion' (thought still a delusional realm), still allows parents entrapped in the delusion to expose their children to their constrained values and preferred thinking of same (misguided as they are) - but ultimately (per a 'reasonable' level of exposure and indoctrination to religion, secured by an overkill 'cap of restraint' so to speak), the child's mind is not 'brainwashed' to a level of lunacy such that their mind is forever closed-off (hardened) to a 'later life ability' to re-evaluate facts or concepts or acquire new facts and/or concepts that were previously kept from them or forbidden for them to investigate (in years gone by).
          Those of us impervious to religion's grip recognize that 'severe relentless exposure' to religion can, and often does, 'ruin lives' in that people indoctrinated to the degree of being 'severely brainwashed' often end up at a point of no return - having minds that (after progressing to adulthood) 'remain' incapable of reviewing (even viewing) facts in opposition to their delusions, and, the more severe their 'fervor of righteousness' the more dangerous they become to others. The 'freedom' we speak of in the USA is 'not' the type where people have the freedom to subject children to activities of relentless ritual that form fanatical mindsets of long term damage. Exposure to a concept (and reasonable participation in 'legal ritual') is one thing, but 'severe' exposure and/or 'forced' endless participation is another. As a society we owe 'all' children a ceiling of limited damage, a reasonable chance to 'maintain' an ability to outgrow (shed) imposed perspectives of prior authoritative captivity whereas 'later in life' they can attain (embrace) a comprehensive knowledge base and weigh 'all' information available to form their final 'adult' perspective. There's nothing worse than an adult that is limited by a mental rulebook of past childhood that was 'pounded in' as a child, leaving the victim adult closed off to the 'truth of it all' (the critical missing facts that change the 'reality of it all'). This is a damaged person that cannot be reasoned with. This is a 'know-it-all' that knows nothing of perspectives that correct false realities. This is a person with the capability to be very dangerous. There's no wisdom (or legality) in allowing the manufacture of 'loose cannons' of the human variety - people that as children are 'ruined', people that are implanted with an attitude shaped by religious 'only' material of fantasy, and, furthermore trained to evade and disregard anything in conflict with all religious fantasy taught. These teachers of course being parents, ministers, priests, popes, and 'other like people' of an equally severe bias thus equally severe ignorance of the truth of the natural world.
          Though generally, in the US, most blind faithers just become a pain in the ass that work to deny personal freedoms to the rest of us - even though these freedoms of 'the rest of us' do not affect 'they' (the religious) themselves personally. They just arrogantly want us to do, what they want us to do, to join them in their conformance to their delusions - this craving being nothing more than an emotional dependency for validation (thus justification) that counters the doubts they themselves 'have' deep in their gut (thus hating it when others such as myself don't follow their lead in delusional interaction). Our rights to dismiss them as a foreign substance on the heels of our shoes, our rights to disagree with them and 'opt out' in their agenda of lunacy is of course seen by the frustrated flocks of the religious as unacceptable. After all, their 'canned' religious lunacy is what is best for us all - because they 'just know' that the rest of us possessed of a comprehensive perspective are wrong (heathens on the wrong path) and therefore they must save us from ourselves (we being people that know everything that they know of 'no importance', and everything else that they don't know of 'great importance').
          The greatest arrogance of profound self-indulgence of the religious (in general) is the major self-serving assumption that the ability to be fair, ethical, and moral or feel a sense of 'right or wrong' or 'sense of duty', or, feel empathy or love or be charitable are thought (by the religious) to be the sole property and sole attributes of religions/cults (and associated gods) 'that' can only be attained or generated (within a person as imbued by god to become an innate or intrinsic part of that person) through religious involvement (thus worship of god/s). Now that's a self-serving arrogance that is incalculably 'Over the Top'. All these human properties (qualities/traits) are results of human development throughout the time scale of human civilization that have flourished 'in spite' of the historical omnipresence and countering negatives of religions and gods and their abysmal track record of human destruction (wars, horrors, executions, imprisonments, ritual sacrifices, tortures, and general all around misery) which those of us of 'beyond moronic' knowledge of human history are well aware of.
          The second pathetic arrogance of the religious (one that entertains me to no end) is an arrogance of extended stupidity that just can't be topped - the arrogance that keeps them 'all' in an undercurrent hostility toward each other whereas all continually get into each other's business trying to convert each other to each other's brand of manifest Moronism. Not only do religious people irritate the shit out of people like me, they irritate the shit out of each other because each religion/cult thinks that 'it' is the right 'one' and that those of all other religions/cults are 'not' favored by god and thus will 'not' be invited to take-up residence in heaven or wherever. All morons on moronic missions.
          The built-in irony of religious arrogance that 'squares itself' to a whole new magnitude is that most people whom reject religion, in actuality, know much more about the history and the realities of given religions than do those of religious devotion - a result of the religious flocks 'not' wanting to know ('not' wanting to face) therefore 'not' seeking-out or investigating the truths within the evolution of their religion that take-away (deflate) the 'divine aspects' of their preferred beliefs - thus demoting the 'divine aspects' to mere 'human aspects' of manipulation used to market said given beliefs. Note that I hi-lited the above word evolution, a word that the religious really hate. For religious people to face the truth, that 'their' religion (and 'all' religions) are absolutely and factually nothing more than manipulations of multiple authors 'over time' that evolved a given religion's story to fit said author's needs (requirements, preferences of thought) as paralleling their knowledge and capability 'in their time' upon this earth.
     The Theory of Infinity - the End of God is a book that's simply focused on the harsh realities of the physics (form and function) of our universe. It (my book), both in the Preface and in the About the Author sections, offers 'no' respect to the delusional ramblings of those people in the god business (members of given religions/cults). Whether these religious 'hangers-on' are in sales/marketing or management. Whether simply members of a given religion/cult 'voluntarily' wrapped in their absurd beliefs in blind opposition to all incontrovertible evidence, common sense, and logic to the contrary. Whether they've been indoctrinated since childhood to embrace their 'integrity absent' mindset of dogmatic doctrine (a mental state/infestation that's just too hard for them to escape per the peer pressure of the 'wayward' like-minded around them and/or their familiarity of habit and/or being resigned to not disturbing their long established comfort zone) - thus they (the religious) are ultimately constrained by a weak 'will' that disables their ability to stand apart from their like-minded friends and family (family being those responsible for the long term brainwashing, for imposing religion and the centric god of 'it' on the subject person throughout childhood). Or whether entrapped by forces beyond their control (with no option to even know any better) such as being born within a backward society of long established religious fervor - in certain cases this can be manifest in the US, but mostly this is a seamless reality in 2nd and especially 3rd world countries. These are the people that worldwide are taught to perform the dance of the Religio-Fantastico (the dogmatic two-step). These are people that are 'always at the ready' to impose their 'will' on others and 'always just know' that they are right, though possessed of 'literally zero' knowledge about the facts and criterion that form all opinions of opposition. All that they know are from scraps of scribblings from people of long ago, all of whom were profoundly ignorant in terms of today - and because of this, people back then were able to invest in such beliefs. People of today in the USA can't legitimately cop to the same excuse because theirs is a 'voluntary' ignorance. In the US these are people that 'choose' to have, while in 3rd world countries these are people that 'unavoidably' have, a backward Bronze Age mindset of profound ignorance.
      It is also fair to say that soldiers of god (that sell and continually market god, and even worse, forever try to force feed their brand of god to/upon others) 'have never gained control' of their minds - their authority to do so, of course, being sanctioned per communications thousands of years ago (in the form of dreams and visions - thus delusions) by a 'then and now' imagined god's meticulous instructions and purpose (netting rules and reg's) that soon after were penned by energized mortals (of mental failing) in their imagined god's stead. A sidebar - of no surprise to me is the FACT that 'literally all' of the 'god given' purposes and backdrop understandings of the described instructions from god (penned by people) have proven to be WRONG. My problem with the religious is that they have succeeded in imposing much of their will (delusional requirements) upon people whom want nothing to do with their world of fantasy (religions/cults) and the fictional god/s central to them. What ever happened to the Constitutional intention of the separation of Church and State? Our laws are riddled with the stench of religious influence. And yes, this is from whence my religious hostility emanates. No law that is contaminated with religious requirement should stand as legal - but to the contrary many laws, both Federal and State, are tainted with conformance and absurd accommodation to religious requirements. Such is the gutless, politically correct, nature of our nation.
      With respect to those of blind religious faith, their's is an act of stupendous laziness that facilitates their 'desired' (sought after) perspective, a planned (by design) purposeful failure to gain the base knowledge of reality to begin with, leveraging blissful ignorance in combative arguments that they fail to qualify to engage in to begin with - remember we mustn’t learn the in-depth facts that burst the bubbles of the Religio-Manifesto. Taking the opinions of those in the god enterprise 'seriously' is comparable to giving the 'vote' to 6 year old's (children of an equally profound ignorance with respect to the physics of scientific/factual reality), many of which will be denied this 'reality education' by loving parents that need to be slapped (and I mean very, very hard).
      The only shame worse than this 'Big Bang Bull' is the ongoing insistence (emotional dependency) that there is a god (facilitating the emotional need of the bulk of the inhabitants of the planet) - though not a sliver of proof has ever been found in the history of the world (cult driven delusions not with standing).